Review Site

[occasionalhobbyist]

Originally posted by slinkybender
Just one? Not a set of mini-perfumes, spray bottles...........

Amature.

Did I ever claim to be anything other?

 

[jras]

Originally posted by justme
I've only given my handle to a sex worker once and even that time I winced.

I've had them guess my handle from details in my review. No surprise there!

 

[justme]

Originally posted by jras
I've had them guess my handle from details in my review. No surprise there!

I see women that tend not to be 'net savy (yet).

 

[Anjelika69]

Very tacky

Originally posted by Daniel_NYC
Bringing this diatribe back on topic, I was with a provider on Saturday that proclaims the existence of a review site for providers only. She claims that many of the popular UG posters are reviewed there and everything is described in the minutest of details.

Anyone care to field this question?

I still want to know on what board is this taking place because it sounds very juvenille and I can't believe it exists.

 

[VV]

Big dog has had a provider only board for years although it seems it's not at all that big a secret anymore.

 

[Casper]

Am I rated BFE or FB ??

 

[Slinky Bender]

Can't you be both?

PS I'll bet that I'm reviewed on that board even though no one who posts on it has ever been with me. How's them apples?

 

[Cat_Ballou]

Originally posted by Casper
Am I rated BFE or FB ??

What's FB?

(It's so odd, I can't even imagine "reviewing" my clients: based on what criteria?)

 

[Casper]

I guess I can be both but I'd still like to find out if I'm reviewed. I may have to increase my rates if they like me.

When life hands you apples, make apple cider.

 

[Daniel_NYC]

Originally posted by Cat_Ballou
What's FB?

(It's so odd, I can't even imagine "reviewing" my clients: based on what criteria?)

BFE= Boyfriend Experience
FB= Fat Bastard

I think its original purpose was to inform providers who is o.k.
Sort of another screening tool available to them. Besides knowing what a client likes and in to before the session may make a repeat customer of him.

I have read reviews where the hobbyist states; "She was wonderful, it was almost like she could read my mind, she knew exactly what I liked".

 

[Cat_Ballou]

Funny, I thought it might mean Frat Boy...

FWIIW, most of the BFs I've had were also capable of being FBs...

Anyway -- Happy Thanksgiving, Daniel, and everyone else here; I wish safe travels and happy days for you all...

 

[Casper]

And many Happy Endings to ya'll.

 

[justme]

Originally posted by Cat_Ballou
(It's so odd, I can't even imagine "reviewing" my clients: based on what criteria?)

Hygene? Hotel used? Invaseivness?

 

[JackT]

Dreamboy Quotient? Size? Speed?

 

[jras]

Originally posted by justme
Hygene? Hotel used? Invaseivness?

Generosity?
Mental health?
Halitosis?
cut/uncut?
skid marks?

 

[EasyP]

huh

I'm confused - does this review site still exist and if so, how does a member of UG get membership to it? Inquiring minds want to know.

 

[Demee]

Reviews?

Will the clients be encouraged to submit extremely graphic reviews or will a more general approach be encouraged?

And do clients really prefer those graphic reviews to the basic info sort of review?

Demee

 

[pony]

Generally, each site sets publishing guidelines and I won't mention those sites here.

Personally, I prefer to leave out the graphic details and write in a style that will allow the reader to "read between the lines". I think that style suits most upscale provider personas.

You may also want to set your own guidelines with your clientele.

I do agree with your philosphy that after a certain time limit, additional reviews reach diminishing returns, excluding the YMMV factors.

Good Luck to you! ;-)

 

[justlooking]

I think non-graphic reviews are worthless.

I think anyone who follows "review guidelines" set by a service provider is corrupt and not worth listening to.

(OTOH, I don't post reviews.)

 

[curious]

I think, in this instance, half a loaf is better than nothing.